Its generally accepted that clocks in the same architecture will make it run better. No one is really going to argue against something like a 4.5 3570k being better than like a i5-3470 at max turbo clock. the cpus chosen were just a bunch of cpus of different core count and architectures to gather data from modernish cpus for the game. if your quad core intel cpu is faster than the tested cpu, then just add a few fps to the tested results +/- irregularities with systems and testing situations. No one is going to rage, its a low requirement game as for cpu, all they needed to test was the general core difference.
i5 3470 is selling for $200 and with a mobo like asus z77-v lx, i think it can hit 4 ghz with multicore turbo enabled. kidding aside, could you test core i5 3570k or 3470 (at stock) instead of core i5 3550, the 3570k is selling for $220 at newegg, i5 3550 is $225 and fx8350 is $200(excl. 1920x1080 Dota 2 Heroes Wallpaper Awesome Luxury Elegant Best Of Beautiful Fresh Inspirational Lovely Unique New &MediumSpace 10. this is the second multiplayer game since the guild wars 2 where core i3 has taken a lead. the time has come again to recommend core i3 over fx!! relax c.a.l.f., i am kidding, it's not 2011 anymore. *fingers crossed* and desktop core i3 is keeping up with fx8350 and then beats it in avg fps? so much for moar cores. looks like intel is stepping up to the game, geddit? i hope rabid amd fanboys (r.a.l.f.) don't rage at toms like they did at xbitlabs when they showed hd4000 beat 7660 in f1 2012 low q. the 7660 igpu was designed to perform for this kind of games. De5_Roydid i see that right - hd 4000 beat 7660 igpu in low res gaming.
0 kommentar(er)
